🟎 Log & other notes or thoughts
1/04/25, 18:28 -
Despite my best efforts to prolong my reading, I finished “My Dearest Holmes” today. I fear I may not be able to express my thoughts on it properly in this language though. I'll resort to writing it in Spanish for now.
Este libro fue una experiencia. Buena o mala, no sé. Es excelente: Más que nada quiero destacar que logra tomar aspectos importantes de la personalidad y carácter de ambos personajes en los libros originales y reimaginar con una cercanía increíble a lo canónico como se desarrollaría una relación (o un casi algo, cosa que me gusta mucho porque su amistad y dinámica es profunda y compleja y dudo que pueda ser definida con un concepto así de simple, o al menos eso opino yo) entre ambos. El anhelo, la melancolía, los celos y todas las palabras que no se dicen…
Un detalle que me gustó mucho en particular fue que se tiene en cuenta lo reservado y abnegado que llega a ser Holmes con sus necesidades y placeres y como se reflejaría eso en una situación así. Ni hablar de la inmensa lealtad de Watson y cómo ésta impacta sus amistades y su casamiento y tal.
Otra cosa que no sabía cuando empecé a leer este pastiche es que se iba a enfocar tanto en El Problema Final, cosa que también me resultó muy interesante porque siempre me encantó leer las distintas interpretaciones que puede llegar a tener cada autor al relatar esa historia desde una perspectiva más romántica. Considerando que los libros son de aventura/crimen y que están generalmente enfocados en el caso, obviamente que Watson no relata en ningún momento cómo es que “volvieron a la normalidad” o cómo se sintieron ambos en ese reencuentro que es, cuando te lo ponés a pensar, bastante tristón, trágico diría. Está bueno porque siento que rellena lo que queda un poco inconcluso en los libros originales (no intento criticarlos con ese comentario ni nada por el estilo, solo digo que me resulta curioso ver la interpretación de cada persona).
Lo ÚNICO que me atrevo a cuestionar es el rol de Mycroft en la trama. No estoy muy seguro de cuál era la idea… se siente casi como si le echaran la culpa de la separación de los personajes principales, lo que creo no tiene mucho sentido en un pastiche/fanfic así -
¿No es acaso parte de la angustia, del drama, el hecho de que Holmes
le dejó creer por años a Watson que estaba muerto por voluntad propia, para protegerlo del peligro?
No entiendo muy bien por qué necesitarías que otro personaje tome la culpa si la decisión de Holmes
tiene completo sentido considerando su personalidad y carácter, tanto en los libros originales como
en este pastiche. No sé, me pareció un tanto raro, pero al fin y al cabo no sabemos mucho de Mycroft
en los libros originales y mucha de la idea que tengo de él proviene o de otras adaptaciones o
de opiniones generales de otros fans, así que dentro de todo no estaría “fuera de personaje” simplemente porque no hay mucho personaje en el que basarse en primer lugar.
En conclusión, porque siento que me estoy enredando y siendo poco claro: Es un libro bastante bueno. No voy a decir que es nada del otro mundo, es prácticamente un fanfic refinado, pero es muy disfrutable y salí muy satisfecho al haberlo terminado.
.png)
01/04/25, 11:14 - Expanded my Holmes corner a bit today. Will have to make a new collection subpage eventually.

.png)
31/03/25, 20:48 - A couple of notes I intend to expand upon some other time when I feel more like writing: Today, besides playing a bit of “The Awakened”, I managed to get my hands on a community copy of “The Beekeeper's Picnic” (eternally grateful for that! I'll make sure to pay for a copy whenever possible) and have a lot of thoughts to share eventually! All I'll say for now is that it's incredible and totally worth it. If you're a fan of Sherlock Holmes it's a must play. I also started reading Rohase Piercy's “My Dearest Holmes”. I've read about a quarter of the book in one go and decided to stop so I could save up the rest for another occasion LOL so far so good!
.png)
30/03/25, 12:21 - Finished playing “Sherlock Holmes: The Case of the Silver Earring” yesterday. What an improvement! The game has some little details and mechanics + somewhat better controls that made the experience much more enjoyable. I had a pretty good time with it! The case itself was interesting as well. I don't think there's much else I can comment on since it is a 20 year old game after all, but needless to say I was pleasantly surprised by the end of it :-)
I'm going to write down some of my future plans for Sherlock Holmes media so that I don't forget: First of all, as I imagine is a bit obvious by now, I'm intending to play every Frogwares Sherlock Holmes game I possibly can run on my computer. I definitely won't get very far though, it's a pretty low end PC. I'm currently playing “The Awakened” (the 2008 version, of course). Besides that, I kind of need to search for more adaptations to watch. I still have the 1964 Douglas Wilmer show bookmarked and a whole lot of movies that I started and never finished but I'm not sure if any of those are of my interest right now… I guess I'll have to see. I've also been meaning to watch the soviet holmes remake but I'm a bit scared I won't like it since I love the original so much. I'm hoping for the best.
.png)
28/03/25, 12:04 -

the story is dumb but this is like a game for 8 year olds im not going to pretend like it even has to make sense. also the art is like your average ds shovelware level bad but whatever its a puzzle game i guess its fine in that aspect. i wont be doing the extra puzzles i got though im done with this thing
.png)
27/03/25, 15:29 - Just finished playing Frogwares' “Sherlock Holmes: The Mystery of the Mummy”, the Nintendo DS version specifically, since I couldn't get it to run on my PC (The only reason why it's free on Steam is because the entire game is unplayable). I managed to get through the entire thing in 2 hours or so, but overall it was fun. I must say I was expecting more of a challenge? The only challenge was the controls, I think. They're a bit wonky and I kept accidentally clicking stuff but you kind of end up getting used to the weird camera movement eventually. I barely understood the answer to the mystery though lmfaoo the voice actors speak way too fast. Overall it's an average DS puzzle game but I had a good time with it. I will however give it one less star on my tracking page because Watson only shows up in the last cutscene :-(
.png)
16/03/25, 13:19 - I'm not sure I have much to comment on but I still wanted to write one of these. I haven't been doing much Sherlock Holmes related stuff lately (or at least not as much as usual) since I'm a bit focused on other things at the moment (not that my hyperfixation has faded whatsoever, i'm just channeling it in different ways LOL) but I'll try to do a quick recap of these past few days:
- After watching Richardsons interpretation of “The Hound of Baskervilles” (and also realizing I had skipped over one of his two movies but not feeling very up to watching the first) I also read a bit about his interpretation, mostly about the conflict between these iterations of the stories and Granada's. Really funny to me that no one felt the need to check when exactly the stories were becoming public domain before paying for the copyright. It's sad that two great actors have been pitted against each other for the same role though. I wonder what could have been of Ian Richardson's Holmes had it happened at an earlier point in his career.
- I watched another of the Basil Rathbone movies. “The Woman in Green” was a bit dumb, but enjoyable nonetheless. I am very tired of seeing Moriarty's face though. Can he just die already? I've also started considering rewatching some of the earlier ones whenever I get done with this because I feel like my opinion on these interpretations of the characters have changed a bit and I may enjoy them more on a second watch.
- I also continued watching Elementary. Nothing to note there.
- I started reading Starring Sherlock Holmes by David Stuart Davies. It's been really fun to see how the interpretations of the character developed throughout the earlier years. I'm only getting started though, I'm currently at the Basil Rathbone movies (page 46 out of 216, to be precise) but it has been really interesting so far - I can't wait to get to the later ones so I can appropriately compare the adaptations throughout the years.
.png)
12/03/25, 14:22 - I watched Ian Richardson's 1983 “The Hound of the Baskervilles” today. Once again, I was surprised to find that I really did enjoy it! I wasn't really sure what to expect because I hadn't heard ANYONE talk about this Holmes before so I had absolutely no expectations whatsoever. This is a really good adaptation of the original novel - it has its small changes here and there but nothing significant enough to really change the story - and is generally a pretty good movie. I really liked Richardsons interpretation of the character. This Holmes felt a bit more giddy than usual but it's a welcome change to the character LOL Besides it's not like it goes too off the rails or anything. I particularly liked this version of Stapleton as well, it felt pretty close to what I had imagined when reading the novel - a bit dorkier than most adaptations, I guess? which is exactly what I had imagined a guy that likes to collect butterflies to be. I also enjoyed some of the final scenes a lot; Holmes' fight with the hound and Stapleton's ending was GREAT. I really liked the tension that the scene had.
Also, a small note about the hound, this one manages to stay in the realism of Sherlock Holmes canon without straying too far on the supernatural aspect of this story WHILE keeping the dog absolutely terrifying. It's literally just a normal sized dog but it really does manage that balance and for that I am very glad.
I must say however that I am watching far too many The Hound of the Baskervilles adaptations lately. Yesterday I also finished watching all of the currently available Peter Cushing 1968 episodes and the last two were also an adaptation of this same story so I am getting a bit tired. I also started to watch Elementary's second season but I doubt there's anything I can comment on that. Not sure how I feel about this adaptation's Mycroft.
.png)
09/03/25, 16:56 - I just finished watching “Murder by Decree”. I ended up enjoying it a lot! All I knew going into it was that it was based on the Jack the Ripper murders and I was very curious to see how exactly they would go around it in this particular movie since I have also watched “A Study in Terror”, which was released a few years before and is based on the same case.
Weirdly enough watching this was cathartic. I'll vaguely spoil the ending if I explain myself so I'll censor it just in case; this movie was one of the very few instances I can remember a Sherlock Holmes case being this tragic. Lately I had gotten so used to the usual happy and satisfying ending of most Holmes movies that I forgot just how different the stories feel when they're this realistic in their conclusion, I guess. Not that I think the entire thing was particularly realistic, I just mean that it's a really, really unsatisfying conclusion, yet one that makes sense given the circumstances. The people in power responsible for everything that went down barely face any repercussions and all of the victims were murdered pointlessly. It's sad and it's unsatisfying and yet it makes it so much more interesting and therefore enjoyable to watch… I don't know. I liked how the movie kept the mystery unraveled until the very end though. I usually like being presented with all the facts of the case so that you can piece it yourself but sometimes feeling exactly as lost as Watson is pretty enjoyable too LOL
Also the contrast between this movie and “A Study in Terror” is kind of insane. I kept thinking that if I had watched this in the opposite order I'd probably have thought that Study in Terror is way too simple and has a really predictable and dumb conclusion in comparison to the other one, just how I kept wondering why they made the mystery of the case in “Murder by Decree” so complicated in comparison to “A Study in Terror”. Does that make any sense? I'm kind of glad I watched them in this order… otherwise I would have probably been really disappointed, I think. Not that either of these is exceedingly bad or anything, they're just REALLY different in the way they present themselves, I guess. I am really bad at expressing myself in English, sorry.
I also have to say that I really enjoyed both Christopher Pulmmer's and James Mason's interpretations of their respective characters. I really liked Holmes particularly. He felt very emotional and human to me but managed to stay in character and didn't go too off the rails… I am always very glad to see genuinely likable depictions of Holmes and this was no exception to that. Also, the interactions between him and Watson were really good and generally very enjoyable - they have various little moments and scenes that I felt added a lot to both their characters and made their dynamic really nice to watch.
Basically, I had a really good time. I think I may retake watching Elementary now - I needed a bit of a break and went back to the Victorian adaptations - which should keep me occupied for a while LOL The season count really is overwhelming. I'll probably keep taking these breaks in between each of them.
.png)
05/03/25, 22:30 - I am currently watching the very last episodes of season one of Elementary and it got me thinking about how much I seem to not enjoy when the character of Moriarty is used as some sort of overarching plot or depicted as this super relevant criminal mastermind. I guess it's a much more developed idea of the original character considering the fact that in the books the only reason he existed was to kill Holmes but I just can't find it interesting at all. I've tried, but I can't. There's something about this whole criminal mastermind situation that seems particularly out of place for me in Elementary, but I can't say I've liked this idea applied to the older adaptations either and I definitely did not like it in the more recent ones (I think Sherlock BBC might have the worst iteration of the character known to man. To me at least. I've found him insanely irritating).
So I guess it is understandable why so many versions make Moriarty be an actual nemesis to Holmes since he is a very underused character and is only mentioned I believe twice in the entire canon despite often being called Holmes “arch nemesis”, but I dont think it's really my thing. I like it when adaptations keep it more on a case to case basis type of story - I'm sure there's a proper term for this that I don't know - which technically is quite close to the original books. Which is a bit weird because I can't seem to find a middle ground; I'd say I like it the most when adaptations are as close to canon as possible but that sometimes makes it a bit hard to watch when they do differ and most of my personal favorites are quite different from the source material. I wonder where exactly I'm drawing the line, unconsciously.
.png)
01/03/25, 01:24 - Parts of my notes on Elementary and Sherlock Holmes in general that are written completely in Spanish but I fear translating it may make it lose its original sentiment… this is my log after all… Usually I'd go through the trouble of rewriting this in English but I don't think there's too much point in it. It's basically everything I've already said before but a bit rethought if anything. The language is pretty neutral if you want to have a go at translating it.
“Esto de ver Elementary me tiene pensando en lo mucho que me gustan las adaptaciones que refuerzan y exploran más la idea de cómo Watson y Holmes se salvaron mutuamente al conocerse PIENSO… Elementary lo toma muy orientado a la adicción de Holmes y la necesidad que tiene Watson de enmendar los errores de su pasado pero es un paralelismo (probablemente no es ese el término adecuado pero es tarde y no tengo ganas de buscar uno mejor) bastante interesante con el dúo de los libros originales; Un Watson cansado y gravemente afectado por la guerra conoce a Holmes quien de alguna manera le da una nueva motivación, una pasión diría, por compartir “su amor de todo lo que es bizarro”, un Holmes también adicto y cerrado que por primera vez tiene un compañero, alguien que admira su intelecto y aprecia su trabajo - mi explicación podría ser mucho más extensa y podría dar más ejemplos si mi cerebro estuviera en un estado más óptimo (digamos, si hubiera dormido un poco más anoche) pero mi punto es que lo que siempre me gusto mas de estos personajes es su capacidad para complementarse y aprender el uno del otro y verlo representado y explorado en una serie con este nivel de cariño y dedicación es increíble. Así que por más que le tire mierda a algunas de las adaptaciones más viejitas por adaptar el personaje de Watson terriblemente en múltiples ocasiones, también creo que muchas fueron cruciales para que se le de la importancia que merece el personaje y para que terminemos viendo estas representaciones que yo considero tan lindas y completas como lo es Elementary, que logra darle la importancia que se merecen ambos personajes por separado y como un dúo. Versiones así no podrían existir sin las que se atrevieron en su momento a poner a Watson como un personaje en vez de inmediatamente descartarlo por no poder cumplir el rol de narrador en un medio visual. En conclusión: No, it is both, or none.”
.png)
27/02/25, 23:21 - I started to watch Elementary. I feel like everytime I write one of these I've abandoned or postponed my previous goal and started a new adaptation LOL I can't help it! I like being able to drop and pick back up whatever I was watching whenever I want honestly.
Anyway! Onto the actual topic of this entry. Elementary so far is great! I'm having a very good time so far. I've only watched seven episodes of the first season I believe but it's been a very fun watch. I really really like these modern interpretations of the characters (to my own surprise, since I tend to dislike any adaptation that's out of the victorian setting) and I found myself pleasantly surprised that I was actually able to enjoy a series set in a contemporaneous setting without absolutely hating Holmes. This is a huge deal to me.
I find the general focus on Holmes' addiction to be a very interesting take on the original stories and I'm very curious to see how exactly that turns out.
To my surprise this Holmes is also very likable but I can't tell exactly why I am not finding him annoying as hell. I assume it's because he does show some sort of emotionality perhaps…? A general misunderstanding of (or lack of respect for) social cues? I don't think those are the proper words to express what I want to say but then again English is not my first language so I'll settle for that. I just like the guy a lot. I've always felt it's a bit egotistical to say I find Holmes relatable in general but I really do see a lot of myself in this guy LOL even more than usual. Not because I have any sort of inhuman intelligence or deductive reasoning but because I too am really awkward. And don't usually understand or respect social cues. And am really annoying.
Also, this Watson is amazing… I love her already. I was really, really hoping this adaptation in particular didn't fall back into the dumber, comedic misinterpretation of Watson that is present in a lot of adaptations (not that I REALLY expected it to, I had seen a bit of the show before when it was on cable and that is definitely not the Watson I remembered seeing) but once again I've had no issues with the interpretation in that regard and I am very glad. I am DELIGHTED to see how much she can contribute to Holmes' work and how valuable she is as a companion! Hers is a really capable, intelligent and most of all super kind interpretation of the character that is amazing to see. Genuinely, I'm so glad I can enjoy both of their respective characters as their own… Of course their relationship and dynamic is crucial to any adaptation but it is super nice to see Watson reworked into something more than just a narrator.
Speaking of their dynamic as a duo, although I still have a lot to watch and I know the show must have a lot of character development coming, they're really interesting and fun to watch and I am SO grateful for that. Usually, with other modern adaptations that I figure I do not need to name (I believe there's only one that I've expressed distaste for here before LOL) I find their relationship very hard to watch… I was afraid it might be a general modern adaptation issue (to be fair it is hard to adapt their dynamic to modern setting while still making it look natural) but I feel like Elementary has done an excellent job with it. Perhaps it's the fact that it's kind of a rewriting/different take on the original characters that has kind of made me keep an open mind about it…? I'm not sure. All I can say for certain is that I am enjoying the show a lot more than I thought I would and for that I am very grateful. I have to say however that the season count is a bit intimidating… and we all know what usually happens with shows that span for that long (there's usually a pretty noticeable quality decline, in most cases at least) so I really, really hope this doesn't end up disappointing me. Only time can tell, I guess.
.png)
26/02/25, 12:59 - I am finally taking the time to watch Basil Rathbone's movie series again! I have to admit I skipped one (1) movie because I was a bit tired of the WW2 oriented plots but honestly if I hadn't done so I wouldn't have gotten around to watching the next movies which I found so much more enjoyable! I actually can't believe I'm having a good time with these instead of suffering through them. The mysteries and the cases are actually interesting to me now. Not to criticise the earlier ones since I know many people do like them, but they were definitely not my thing. I've also somewhat started to like or at least be able to stand this Watson. I don't know if they turned down the whole comic relief thing or if it's just the fact that I'm finding the plots more interesting and overall enjoyable but I must say I don't find him as annoying as I did while watching the previous movies. It's been great.
.png)
23/02/25, 20:32 - Okay so I also watched “Sherlock: A Case of Evil” today. This was. Wow. I don't even know where to start talking about this movie, and I don't know if that's good or bad.
It's a really cool reimagining of all the characters and premises of the original (well, kind of, I must say I found Holmes utterly boring without his usual quirks) and a pretty good movie as well, but I can't help but feel uneasy about some of the changes done. I can't say I'm a big fan of Holmes' constant heterosexual romances (and a threesome scene that went on for way too long. It almost sounds like a joke). Most of his character is kind of explained by the fact he's young and inexperienced in this version but, well… I dont think I'm being very objective here… I try to keep an open mind but as it is probably very obvious from my reviews and previous log entries I don't really like when adaptations stray a lot from the original material (for the most part).
I'd say the character that benefited the most from these little details and changes here and there was 100% Watson. This was a really interesting and honestly very likeable take on him that surprised me a LOT. I really liked the detail of him doing the autopsy reports and I loved how the movie showed off his medical knowledge and the whole inventor thing was also a nice touch. I was ready to completely loathe him after seeing how Holmes acted (he is usually the most benefited one of the two) but to my surprise I ended up liking him a LOT more.
I was also very wary of the whole “Moriarty being a supervillain” idea when the movie started but at the end of the day it didn't bother me that much. I just consider it ironic that so many adaptations seem to go with it and I always found it kind of dumb but Vincent D'Onofrio's interpretation was excellent and I ended up pretty satisfied with the character.
In conclusion: I liked Watson, Moriarty, Mycroft and hell, even Lestrade, but I found Holmes to be… boring (and unnecessarily heterosexual, a point I am completely serious about) which is the worst thing a Sherlock Holmes adaptation can be. Oh well. I can't say I didn't have a good time watching it, but considering the absolutely insane 4.1 general rating in Letterboxd I very much came out disappointed. How the hell did that happen? No more trusting ratings on this site, lesson learnt.
.png)
23/02/25, 15:27 - Today I watched “Sherlock Holmes and the Case of the Silk Stocking”. I don't feel like writing a review since I don't have that many thoughts on this movie but I feel like it's worth it to write it here either way.
First things first, the premise of this movie is kind of insane. I won't clarify simply because I dont think I'm very comfortable discussing the topic - not that it's handled poorly in the movie, I just don't particularly like talking about it - so let's all pretend I'm saving you from spoilers or something of the sort. I had no idea what to expect from it since I had never heard of either of the leading actors or had any idea how the premise was going to be handled, but it actually makes for a pretty decent movie.
As I said before there isn't much for me to say so I'll list some of the notes I've taken and other random thoughts I got while watching:
- I liked both the interpretations of Holmes and Watson, although I must say I ended up liking Watson's over Holmes. That's quite a rare occurrence. Although Rupert Everett is very physically similar to Sidney Paget's illustrations of the original stories, there's something about his Holmes that doesn't quite convince me… Maybe it's just me! I can't put it into words. Ian Hart's Watson on the other hand has pleasantly surprised me. It's an active, intelligent and capable iteration of the character I was really glad to see. I have to say however that whenever he popped up on screen I couldn't stop thinking about this post I saw in Tumblr some weeks ago and for that I am very sorry.
He did a great job though. - Overall the setting was really nice to see. The costumes and the set, I mean. I don't think I can expand more upon this.
So for now my only plans are to keep watching some of the movies I have on my Letterboxd watchlist and write about them here. I'm thinking of getting back into pastiches and TV shows eventually (mostly since Im watching Dexter and Johnny Lee Miller's guest acting has kind of convinced me to watch Elementary) but that will most likely be later. Right now my watchlist looks like this:
- Young Sherlock Holmes (Which I started and never finished)
- Without a Clue
- Sherlock: Case of Evil
- RDJ's Sherlock Holmes 1 and 2 (Which I have ALSO started and never finished. Whoops.)
.png)
17/02/25, 22:15 - Well, I can't say I succeeded with the radio drama thing. This just may not be my medium… I find it very hard to concentrate and keep having to go back and re-listen to the last 5 minutes because I was thinking about something else.
Anyway! Not a lot of progress lately. Despite wanting to watch as many adaptations as possible, somehow I keep going back to watching Ronald Howard episodes… I really can't help it! It has me completely hooked and I'm really enjoying the whole “noticing details I hadn't when watching for the first time” thing.
Besides that, today I found out that my mom has been purposefully keeping a Sherlock Holmes book from me. I was devastated. What a traitor! Turns out she owned (I say owned because I have successfully stolen it) an Oxford University Press edition of The Adventure of the Priory School which is actually renamed to be “Sherlock Holmes and the Dukes Son”. From what I understand these are text adaptations for people that are studying English. It's a stage 1 book (There are up to six stages, for reference) so the story is pretty dumbed down. Either way, I wasn't really interested in the text content of the book but I am fascinated by the illustrations done by Ron Tiner. I had never seen these before! I'll take the time to scan these and upload them here later - that is, if my phone collaborates.
Here's a picture of the front and back of the book. Imagine my surprise when I saw Jeremy Brett's face on a random book in my moms collection. It was a bit of a jumpscare.

.png)
14/02/25, 11:41 - Happy valentines. I took a bit of a break from Peter Cushing's Holmes and started listening to the BBC Sherlock Holmes radio drama since I've heard wonders of it. It's actually my first time listening to one of these… I'm pretty excited. If I end up liking the medium I may take the time to listen to other, more recent ones.
.png)
07/02/25, 13:27 - Thoughts again. A few things I wrote down on my notes earlier today: “It really annoys me when I'm watching any Sherlock adaptation and I take the time to read the comments because I'm interested in knowing the general opinion of other fans and instead I only find 45 comments saying "Jeremy Brett is better" I GET IT! I mean, YES, it is undeniable that Brett one of the best of all time, there is no way to deny such a thing, but if I am watching a series that aired almost 20 years before his, I am not interested in people telling me how great Brett is, let's talk about THIS series, it really can't be that difficult!
I don't know, it's a bit sad that people can't enjoy the other adaptations without having to mention another one they think is better all the time. There's nothing wrong with allowing yourself to watch and appreciate other series from time to time… where's the joy in it otherwise?”
I've found myself more open than ever to watching low-budget, badly written or simply considered “worse” adaptations lately purely out of spite! It is really crazy to me that so many people can't enjoy media without being able to recognize its faults at the same time. I've come across this type of comment while watching many of the older Sherlocks, including Howard, Whitehead, Cushing… even Rathbone! Why not enjoy having so many interpretations of the character to choose from instead of constantly pitting them against each other?
Ah, a pointless rant once again, but this is what this section is here for… It's a pretty good way of putting my thoughts in order.
.png)
06/02/25, 23:58 - I have just found out in my search for the episodes of Peter Cushing's BBC show interpretation that at least 70% of the show is completely missing… What a shame, really! I was very excited to be able to watch an entire show with this Holmes. In my research I've also seen a lot of people say the show was pretty low budget and not as good as the movie… but I was still looking forward to it. What a let down, and a sad one at that. I am still going to watch any episodes I may come across. From what I understand only A Study in Scarlet, The Hound of the Baskervilles, The Boscombe Valley Mystery, The Sign of Four and The Blue Carbuncle are still available, so I'll do my best to find them. Hopefully I'll have better luck with these than with the Geoffrey Whitehead episodes… I'm still bitter about it!
.png)
06/02/25, 21:10 - I watched the 1959 “The Hound of the Baskervilles” movie with Peter Cushing starring as Sherlock Holmes earlier today. I really enjoyed it! I really liked how both Holmes and Watson were interpreted and even though a lot of aspects from the original story were changed, I still feel like it did the novel justice and was a pretty good adaptation overall. I am now going to start watching the 60s series starring Cushing as Holmes as well. I wasn't sure what to expect of his interpretation but I wasn't disappointed whatsoever! I can't formulate a very solid opinion right now though. If I do get around to watching the series then I'll most likely write about it in a future review.
.png)
03/02/25, 01:19 - I have recently discovered, much to my annoyance, that Geoffrey Whitehead's Holmes is almost impossible to draw. I'm saying “almost” out of sheer optimism because I've yet to get this man's face right when drawing him. It is pissing me off beyond belief. I've been tirelessly studying his face using my very poor quality screenshots of the show plus the very few ones I've managed to get online that are a bit more decent for the past few days and I still couldn't draw him properly once. I normally wouldn't complain about such a thing since I often come across a lot of people I can't seem to draw properly, but there's two main reasons why it annoys me so much when it comes to this particular adaptation: One, there is practically NO content of this show online. I've managed to read and like three fanfictions in total and have come across absolutely no fanart but my own. It is maddening to be constantly thinking about a show and not having any content or art to engage in. I can't keep watching the same episodes over and over! This is an urge I would usually get rid of by creating my own art, but as you can see it is currently impossible for I can't seem to draw this guy right and my writing fanfiction is absolutely not my thing. Trust me, I've tried on several occasions, but I've come to the conclusion that words and ideas simply do not come to me. Two, I can't seem to find any reason why I can't draw him. I have studied his features over and over; I could recite them from memory. I feel like I understand them fully, and yet- and yet! Whenever I try to put it down on my Clip Studio Paint canvas it just doesn't seem to work. I can't find a logical reason and it's driving me insane. What a rant. I needed a bit of catharsis. I guess I'll have to stick to drawing other adaptations for now if I don't want to have a nervous breakdown. I fear I may be burning myself out.
.png)
Still 01/02/25, just a bit later (16:49) - It’s been around 4 months since my Sherlock insanity started. I’m going for the fifth.
.png)
01/02/2025, 12:40 - I've been completely neglecting the “thoughts” part of my “Log & other notes or thoughts” section so here is a completely random thought written in a way more informal tone than the rest of my entries. I was rewatching “The case of Harry Crocker” yesterday and I had genuinely forgotten how different this gag is in the original compared to Whitehead's 1980 version… The original is pretty comical, done over with quickly and clearly meant to be taken lightly. Hell, they even laugh at the end of it.
Original scene from the 1954 show
Remade scene from the 1980 show
.png)
29/01/25, 20:31 - Made myself a little Sherlock Holmes themed bookmark today. It's a bit wonky.

On an unrelated note, I've been considering moving this shrine to a separate website. I think I may be clogging up my website's feed with the updates of this page, whoops. If the fixation persists I'll probably make a separate website for this but I'm not sure if I should go through with it… I'm a bit worried I'll leave it abandoned whenever the obsession fades. Oh well! It's just an idea. It would be pretty nice to have a separate space (and I feel like it would give me a bit more freedom to start anew) but it's staying here for now.
.png)
25/01/25, 17:28 - I watched “A Study in Terror” (1965) yesterday night and I had forgotten that I did until just now. It was a good movie overall. I liked both of the main characters' interpretations and the plot wasn't anything much but I think it worked pretty well. I must admit I had already guessed what the resolution would be halfway in but I don't think that makes a movie bad - just a bit predictable. Also, the murder scenes were just plain funny. I couldn't believe the first one was supposed to be an actual murder scene. But either way! I had a pretty good time, it's a very good choice if you don't want something that takes itself too seriously.
.png)
18/01/25, 12:45 - Not much to say, just wanted to note I watched “My Dearly Beloved Detective” today. I absolutely loved it… I'm considering looking for more ‘genderbent’ (what is the proper term?) adaptations of Sherlock Holmes for I had a very good time with this one. Loved how they handled the idea as well. I was a bit wary going into it since, well, it is a 1986 movie after all. But it was remarkably good! I was very pleasantly surprised.
.png)
16/01/25, 11:55 - Hello, long time no update. Happy new year! I started 2025 by still being insane about Sherlock Holmes and have continued to watch and read some adaptations but I haven't updated until now since I was on vacation and very far away from my computer… :(
I finally finished reading Horowitz´s House of Silk and god it was INCREDIBLE. I dont think I'll ever find another pastiche that will top that. I don't feel like writing a review so I'll just note some of my thoughts here: The writing was excellent, both Holmes and Watson were properly characterized and the reveal at the end left me speechless - maybe I should have connected the dots earlier but I really had no idea where the case would go! Im now considering what other pastiches I can read but I want a bit of a break before I actually start reading any.
Besides that, I also started and (kind of) finished watching Geoffrey Whitehead's Holmes a few days ago. In fact I've already written a review since I had quite a lot of thoughts on it. I am a bit disappointed that I can't seem to find the full thing anywhere though.. I watched 20 of the 24 episodes and can't seem to find the rest ANYWHERE else. I've heard there were some reuploads on YouTube a few years back that had the audio randomly changed into German but I'm pretty sure they have since then been deleted. Either way I had a pretty good time watching the rest.
I'm not sure where to go on from here when it comes to audiovisual adaptations though. I started watching RDJs Holmes a few weeks back but haven't really finished either of the movies because I really don't like the action genre. I've heard it is a very good adaptation but I just can't get myself to watch it! It bores me out of my mind D: I'm sure I'll get back to them eventually, just not right now. That does leave a bit lost though… I'm thinking maybe Peter Cushing? I've heard he has various interpretations throughout the years. The thing is that I know next to nothing about those so I'm not sure if they'll be my cup of tea. Oh well! I'll have to try.
That 's it for now. Hopefully next time I'll have made up my mind on what to watch.
.png)
24/12/24, 12:55 - Well! I finished Ronald Howard’s Sherlock Holmes yesterday. Lots of thoughts to share on a future review :)
I’ve also started reading House of Silk, although I am taking it particularly slow. I feel like it’s a bit of a heavy book to read in English since it isn't my first language. I can’t comment much on it because I've only read a chapter and a half though… So far so good. It really does feel like reading Sherlock - I was a bit worried that the change of author would make it feel radically different, but it didn’t. Still, it’s too early to judge! I am still debating what to do next. I have a LOT of movies on my watchlist and not as many shows so I think I’ll tackle the movies first so that the difference isn't that huge. Since I just finished Howard’s adaptation I think I’ll keep watching some of the more comical / lighthearted versions so that the change isn't that abrupt. Maybe the cartoon ones? I’ve been considering The Great Mouse Detective for a while now, so that’s most likely what’s next. Besides future plans I don’t have much else to say. I finished reading one of the books I bought for my collection and it was pretty fun. I actually have never been a fan of re-reading books but for some reason I had a pretty good time going over the stories again. I’ll also re-read The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes and, if possible, I want to share some of the original illustrations my book has here.
.png)
17/12/24, 19:50 - Not exactly sure which direction this entry is going to go. I want to do a quick recap of what I’ve been watching lately because I’m pretty sure there’s some stuff I missed. First of all, as I am pretty sure I have actually mentioned before, I started and kind of didn’t finish watching the Basil Rathbone movies. I am pretty sure it’s staying that way for a while… I’ll retake them eventually but to be completely honest I wasn’t fully enjoying them and I was struggling to actually pay attention to the films lately so I decided it’s for the best if I try watching them some other time.
But I needed some other adaptation to watch in the meantime, of course. I came across Wilder’s “The Private Life of Sherlock Holmes” while looking for recommendations and spent 15 minutes downloading the movie on a random Tuesday and consequently leaving everyone else in the house without wifi. I only got back home at 1 o'clock in the morning so even though I really, really tried to finish watching it that same night, I had to give up half-way in and go to sleep. I finished the rest the next morning though, so my memories of the first half were quite fresh. Anyway! I had a really good time watching it. It's charming, funny and quite entertaining - there’s definitely some critiques to make, especially on the story department and, well, the fact I don’t think the title of the movie is very fitting - but overall I loved it. It was very refreshing.
I also watched the first episode of Sherlock BBC because my brother had to answer a series of questions about the series as homework for his literature class, and I was very much excited to be able to help him with Sherlock-related homework. I am thinking about what I want to say here very carefully for I fear this is quite the controversial adaptation: I don’t think this show is my cup of tea whatsoever. I can certainly see the appeal, and maybe eventually if I run out of practically every other adaptation in existence I might give it a chance, but I don’t think I’ll like it personally. I’ve never been a big fan of modern adaptations and I’m not sure I like how the characters are adapted… I understand in order to adapt it contemporaneously sometimes you have to modify aspects of their personality to make it work but they just feel like completely different characters to me, and very unlikeable characters at that. This may be an unpopular opinion! I’m just stating what I thought while watching ONE episode. Still, I don’t think I’ll be coming back to it anytime soon. I failed to take it seriously… multiple times… and if I wasn’t watching it for literature class homework I would have genuinely turned off my computer at the “high functioning sociopath” line. I am trying to be objective and neutral really badly, but at times it felt corny and ‘cringy’ (I really don’t like that word but it’s quite close to what I want to express) which is completely fine in a Sherlock adaptation and I can usually withstand - some of my favorites are pretty corny - but for some reason it made this particular version completely unwatchable for me. Maybe because I felt it was taking itself too seriously, or because I went in knowing full well that it’s a bit controversial and my expectations weren’t very high, but I’m not quite sure.
Either way, after the failure of trying to watch BBC Sherlock, I decided to start watching Ronald Howard’s adaptation which I was way more likely to actually enjoy.


Well, I think this is about it. Some notes for the next entry: I’m going to keep watching Howard’s adaptation and I’m also considering starting to read some pastiches. I’ll update on that whenever I feel like writing again.
.png)
13/12/24, 12:13 - Translating some of my personal notes for the sake of archiving once again.
“00:22, 13 Dec: I started watching Ronald Howard’s Sherlock Holmes. I’m 24 seconds in and the audio quality of the 50s makes me very nostalgic - it feels like being 10 years old and watching El Zorro on Canal Trece again.
3:23, 13 Dec: Since I don’t have access to my Sherlock log right now, I’ll write this down here so I don’t forget: When I was looking for Sherlock adaptations in B&W I honestly thought I was going to like Basil Rathbone’s interpretation the most, simply because it seems to be the most popular one… I must admit I am having a much better time watching Howard’s. I think this version, from what little I’ve seen, does manage to maintain a certain balance between Holmes and Watson so that they complement each other - Watson is still a bit dumb but I feel he’s far more useful than Nigel Bruce’s, who I feel like is only really there as a comic relief character. Anyway, I really liked how they developed their first encounter and the start of their friendship in the first episode and all the little interactions between the two that came in the next ones. I really like it when an adaptation takes the time to develop their relationship outside of the cases a bit further. In conclusion: It helped a bit with getting back into watching adaptations, since I haven’t felt like watching much lately, mostly because I can’t really get into the 1939 film series - Nothing against Rathbone, he’s marvelous! I just really can’t stand the Watson of his version. I think I may not watch the rest of his movies :( “
.png)
07/12/24, 18:15 - I finished watching Granada today! I'll wait until I can write a proper review before actually sharing my thoughts on it though. All I can say right now is that it was wonderful and I enjoyed it a lot.
On another note, I started watching Basil Rathbone's Sherlock movies and I wanted to note down some of my thoughts on it before I forget:
- I really like Rathbone's interpretation of the character and honestly physically speaking he's very close to what I imagined Holmes looked like when I first started reading the books, but I can't say I like Nigel Bruce's Watson… no disrespect to the actor whatsoever! He just feels… unnecessarily stupid? Maybe that's just how he came off to me, but it just feels like a really REALLY dumbed down version of Watson that I'm not quite sure I like, and honestly this exceedingly comical interpretation of the character weirds me out so much that I can't even find him funny. That's just me though! Don't take me too seriously, maybe I'll like him more overtime.
- It takes so many creative liberties? I don't understand why though. I only watched the Hound of Baskervilles and I know a lot of the next few movies are completely original cases but I can't wrap my head around why exactly they would change the most insignificant details of the story for apparently no reason whatsoever. Once again this is only a first impression so I may be wrong about this as well.
.png)
04/12/24, 18:20 - Translating some notes I have on Granada for the sake of keeping this log accurate and up to date; these are only my initial thoughts so maybe they'll change in the future, please don't take me too seriously!
“I have very few Granada Holmes episodes left but I'm finding it really hard to actually watch. I think it may be the whole “stretching short cases into 2 hour long specials” thing; they feel a bit stretched out and excessively long to me. I feel like it isn't really working… Some of the cases felt too long and confusing to me, which is quite a shame because I think the series is impeccable in every other aspect but this one. The only exception to this I can think of is “The Master Blackmailer” because there wasn't any weirdly complicated added narrative to extend the duration of the case and whenever it did add new details to it, they felt like they actually fit in quite well with the original story and therefore improved upon it. This does worry me a little. I don't want my image or opinion on this series to change dramatically because of a few “bad” episodes, but I think this is just happening to me because I'm nearing the end of it and I'm forgetting to consider how much I have enjoyed some of the earlier episodes.”
.png)
03/12/24, 19:59 - I got a new book today! Spanish edition of “The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes”.

Besides that there isn't really much for me to say. I'm still watching Granada Holmes (I underestimated just how long it is, I think… it's taking a lot of time!) and I'm currently at “The Last Vampyre”, which is… Well, I haven't finished it yet so I can't judge much, but I can't say I'm not really a fan of how they are stretching the story out… I'm not sure why exactly they decided to turn some of the shorter stories into almost 2 hour long specials…?? and I'm also not quite sure it's working? But whatever! I'm really hoping I end up liking some of them because “The Master Blackmailer” was REALLY good. There's definitely an analysis to be made of that episode that I don't have the brain capacity to actually write, but overall the adaptation was incredible.
This is all I noted down for now, so this entry ended up being really short. Hopefully I'll have more to say eventually.
.png)
26/11/24, 18:03 - Quick update today as I do not particularly feel like writing. I finished “The Case-Book of Sherlock Holmes” yesterday, 25th of November, 2024… I have some mixed feelings. I am of course a bit sad about being done with the books and I've realized since finishing them that they were taking up a lot of my free time and I'm not really sure what to do with it now, but simultaneously I am glad that I did manage to reach the goal I had set for myself. I plan to watch as many adaptations as possible now and hopefully shortly review them. Not promising much though, I can't seem to find any motivation to write one for the soviet adaptation.
Anyway! I'm still watching Granada Holmes. Even as I write this I am watching the 25th episode “The Bruce Partington Plans”. There's not much I can say about this show I haven't said before; as I predicted I enjoy Edward Hardwicke's Watson just as much, but there's nothing else I can or want to comment on right now.
.png)
24/11/24, 18:22 -

.png)
20/11/24, 15:47 - Finished “His Last Bow” some days ago and I've read a few of the stories in “The Case-Book of Sherlock Holmes”. I am SO nervous! I'm a bit scared to be so close to the end… I have an infinity of different adaptations on all mediums to watch, read or listen to when i'm done, obviously, but i can't help but feel sad it's coming to an end. It is also a bit ridiculous to take this so seriously. I can't help it though! It's been practically invading my daily thoughts and reading a few stories a day has practically become part of my daily routine. I fear I am going to miss it a lot.
Anyway… I don't think there is much I can say about the books to be completely honest. I've been enjoying them a lot, don't get me wrong! I just dont think there's much for me to comment on. I must admit though that I feel like case-wise the first stories were a bit better… but the general focus and development of Holmes and Watson's relationship totally makes up for it. I like to keep track of the little moments they share outside of cases and I dont think ive highlighted any of the other books as much as the last two!
Overall, it's been great. As much as I am a bit scared to finish the last book, I am also incredibly excited to get to watch other adaptations and have a better base for understanding or forming an opinion on them. Does that make sense? I feel like that now that I know what the originals are like it's going to be much easier to formulate better opinions on any adaptations I may watch in the future and I guess in a way make a better job when writing reviews for this page. Do not expect anything particularly good, though. I've never been a fan of being objective when rating things. It's probably a bad thing but I also do not really care.
On the topic of reviews, I still have to write one for “The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson”! I've finally read all the cases needed to actually understand the ending but I fear I may still have to rewatch the episodes to genuinely comprehend what happened in them. I am still a bit confused on why exactly they were so hard for me to get through… it has some weird jumps in time that are honestly necessary to be able to narrate the events in a way that makes sense to the viewer but also stay true to the original adaptation - noticed this particularly when reading “His Last Bow”, as in, the story by that name included at the end of the book - but even knowing that it was just really hard for me to process for whatever reason… I definitely have to rewatch those eventually.
I've decided I'll pick Granada Holmes back up as soon as I'm done with this book. If i'm not mistaken, from the second season on David Burke doesn't play Watson anymore. I'm a bit sad about it! But I'm sure I'll like Edward Hardwicke's Watson just as much. Well, on a completely different and a bit irrelevant topic, this friday im going out to a nearby city to hang out with some friends and we included going to some bookstores in the zone in our plans. Sherlock Holmes books are certainly easy to find… I'm really hoping I get lucky with the prizes so that I MAY be able to expand my collection. I would not bet on it though… Either way it would be fun to encounter one in the wild. Pretend I'm not talking about one of the most popular book franchises of all time for a second, okay? I get excited over silly stuff like that when it comes to my interests.
Oh, and speaking of my collection! I've expanded it just a little bit. It's not really much, but DIYs are a must, so I've added a few of them. This tiny Sherlock dedicated corner of my shelf was kind of a spur of the moment type of thing and I've always been a bit shy to even HAVE stuff of my fixations, so my mom was definitely surprised when she walked in and noticed the miniature shrine that seemed to pop out of nowhere. Here's a picture of it:

Well, that's about it for today. Not exactly sure when the next update to this will be. Maybe after I finish the book? I guess we'll see.
.png)
17/11/24, 02:04 - No actual update yet - all I really have to say is that I did manage to finish Valley of Fear - but I felt the need to share this picture of my Sherlock collection I took earlier because I've been seeing a lot of people's collections lately.

The hat is very poorly done simply because I do not have a printer so I had to manually draw and re-scale a papercraft guide that is originally meant to fit in your head... Needless to say it was very hard to figure out the dimensions and I fucked it up a lot of times. Oh and I also actually accidentaly stole that book from a classmate. I have no intention of ever giving it back though... so sorry to that guy but I don't think he cares much about it.
.png)
15/11/24, 20:59 - Finished the first season of Granada Holmes! It was spectacular :) Both Jeremy Brett and David Burke's interpretations of their respective characters are incredible… exactly how i imagined both characters to be! Overall the show was super fun to get into and I found myself constantly wanting to watch another episode… usually while doing important stuff like studying… but the show was just that good! I think all of the cases were adapted wonderfully and it was very nice to revisit some of the first ones I had kind of forgotten. I think since it's so early on there's not much for me to say, but if i had to pick my favorite episode so far it would definitely be “The Red Headed League”, i genuinely found it hilarious??? Leaving some of my favorite scenes from the case below so I can share:
Favorite scenes from "The Red Headed League"
.png)
8/11/24, 19:14 - I had already written this update around a week ago, but I did so during class and my phone randomly decided to delete all of my recent notes… Needless to say, I am very pissed off. Still! I'll try to remember what thoughts exactly I had shared on that now lost entry, and complement it with whatever new stuff has come up.
I believe I mentioned on my last update that I had just finished The Memoirs of Sherlock Holmes and was now starting the Hound of Baskervilles. I finished the novel around a week ago, I think? While I was supposed to be reading geography class material… in my defense I had only 10 pages left!
I'm pretty sure there aren't many thoughts I can share about it though. I had my opinion on the story pretty much covered on my last entry and, considering how incredibly close to the original story the soviet adaptation is, there isn't really anything new or different to remark. In fact, I was surprised at how well the show adapted the story - not that I found the original one uninteresting, but it gave all of the characters such an unique touch that definitely made the story just a bit more interesting! Also, the bits where Sherlock was absent were not as tedious to get through as I thought they could have been and I'm very glad about that.
Anyway, moving on: I finished “The Return of Sherlock Holmes” and i've read only the first chapter of “Valley of Fear”. I've only just started the novel so there isn't much i can say about, if at all, but The Return was very good! I can't tell if I liked the short stories more than the ones on The Memoirs though… I loved both of them!
On another, and possibly last note, I also finished watching The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson (often referred by me as “the soviet adaptation”; it's just easier). I know I said I'd finish reading the books first but I couldn't wait! Right as I predicted in my last entry, I didn't really understand much. The jumps in time were confusing me A LOT… and I'm pretty sure I didn't understand the last case whatsoever. Whenever I get to actually reading the original stories I'm sure I'll finish processing what I've watched and I'll finally be able to appreciate the ending even more, but even now I can say I absolutely loved the series! I was going to go more in depth on this, but I feel like it's better if I save up what first impressions I've got for later whenever I actually get around to writing a short review of the show. All you really need to know right now is that I am completely fascinated by it.
Thats around it. Not exactly sure when i'll update this… right now I still have to finish Valley of Fear and as of, right now, I am also going to start watching the Granada Sherlock Holmes adaptation - I checked the episode list and made sure I had read all of the cases of at least the first season - so maybe I'll write another one of these reporting on my progress on the future, and a proper review for the show eventually... not promising it will be anytime soon.
.png)
3/11/2024, 16:50 - Just finished reading “The Memoirs of Sherlock Holmes”. Loved it! I found the short cases to be even more interesting than the ones on “The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes”. I have already seen a TV adaptation of “The Final Problem” - specifically the soviet one - but reading the original story was really interesting and I was really glad to be able to understand Watson's perspective on the matter a bit better… It does leave me wondering how exactly the matter of, well, Sherlock “coming back to life” and all is going to be handled later on, if at all. The Soviet version did what in my very inexperienced opinion I consider an amazing job at handling both his supposed death and his return (way more emotional than what I expected! which is exactly what I was looking for in a Sherlock adaptation), so I'm pretty curious to see what it was like originally and be able to compare it a bit more accurately to any shows or movies I may watch in the future.
So far so good! I'm very excited to start reading "The Hound of Baskervilles" as well. I saw the soviet adaptation for it and I found the story to be very interesting - I was particularly fond of the “supernatural” or almost “horror” aspect the story has to it - and I really want to compare it to the original novel. Not sure if the parts where Sherlock is not present will be as interesting as they are on the show… I'm really hoping they are. I'd hate to get bored of it half-way through! It almost happened to me with “A Study in Scarlet”, to be completely honest.
Besides that, I want to finish reading at least what I consider essential for understanding the two episodes of “The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson” I have left before I attempt to watch them again. Believe me, I tried my best to comprehend what was going on while watching the first part of episode 10, but I believe there's some context I'm missing that I may be able to understand better later on if I've actually read the original stories. If I'm not mistaken, the stories portrayed in those two episodes I've yet to read are "The Adventure of the Second Stain", "The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans" and "His Last Bow", all of which are in books I'm not even close to getting to just yet… I have to finish “The Return of Sherlock Holmes” to get the first one, then “The Valley of Fear” and only then I can read the other two on “His Last Bow”. I could technically just skip to those but I want to keep up the structure I've been following lately. I think this is all I have to comment on so far… I'll update as soon as I'm done with the Hound of Baskervilles :)
✶ Reviews

The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson (1979 - 1986)
Started: 31/08/2024
Finished: 07/11/2024
Full series on YouTube
Review last updated: 30/11/2024, 14:56
I've been racking my brain trying to come up with this review… I decided that maybe writing a simple and unorganized one is probably for the best though. I wish I had kept some sort of log when I started watching it for I feel it would make this far more interesting, but I'll have to make do with what I did write down and what I remember thinking while watching it.
To put it simply: this series is INCREDIBLE. I remember being fascinated with the amount of detail and personality this show manages to have considering it isn't as long running as some of the more popular TV adaptations. I came across it very early into my Sherlock Holmes obsession and it probably wasn't exactly the best place to start (considering that, even though it tends to be very accurate to the original stories, it still changes some details and storylines that Id probably had enjoyed better had I already read the original stories beforehand or had other adaptations to compare it to)

Besides my own personal experience with it, I feel like it's genuinely a very solid adaptation that manages to stay accurate to the stories written by Arthur Conan Doyle while still giving it its own spin on the books that makes the series incredibly special. Some of my favorite details were the following:
- The way that it handled The Final Problem was just incredible. I don't want to spoil it, go watch it!!!!!!!!
- Sherlock and John's relationship is just. wow. So many little details that make them feel so real to me… I'm not quite sure how to express this! They're very close to each other and so very full of admiration and respect for each other! The series also tends to add
little scenes that, while insignificant to the main story, I feel are important for the gradual development of their relationship and it makes the characters so much more relatable and realistic to me. See: Watson teaching Sherlock how to operate a telephone, for example.
- This is something I only was able to appreciate after finishing the books but the show also emphasizes some aspects of Sherlock's personality that are usually lost in some of the other adaptations I've seen. This isn't exactly my own opinion or thought since I have read various discussions of it before but I feel like it's still worth sharing: The idea the general public tends to have (myself included!) of Sherlock being generally rude and insensate is just… Well, not exactly wrong, since he does tend to be a bit inconsiderate at times - mostly because he doesn't seem to comply with social rules or expectations very often - but it tends to overshadow a key aspect of his character, which is his kindness. I feel like the soviet adaptation manages to show this side of him perfectly! It's very much appreciated.
- The Hound of Baskervilles is adapted INCREDIBLY. It made me appreciate the novel a lot more. All of the episodes are great of course, but I feel like emphasizing this particular story because I genuinely had an excellent time watching it.
I am pretty sure this is all I can say about it. I can't and won't give it any sort of rating since this review is incredibly subjective and based directly on my own personal experiences with the franchise but I am completely fascinated by this show and it's definitely my current favorite Sherlock adaptation. That may or may not change in the future, but since it's the Sherlock iteration that made me get really into the franchise again, I'll keep it very close to my heart :)


Sherlock Holmes (1984 - 1994)
Started: 08/11/2024
Finished: 07/12/2024
Full series on YouTube, including the specials
Review last updated: 9/12/24, 17:30
As per usual I have no idea how to start this off… the previous review was complicated enough to write down, I can't imagine how long this one is going to take me! I'm thinking for this review I'll try to go over some notes and thoughts I've written down while watching it and generally explain my overall experience with this show. I have no intention of being objective whatsoever, so forgive me if this entry is particularly personal or anything of the sort - I believe I couldnt write anything that isn't subjective even if I tried, since there's no way I'd be able to judge it properfly from my inexperience.
I started watching Granada's Holmes adaptation on the eighth of november. One of the very first things I noted down is that I was impressed with just how accurate the depictions of the cases seemed to be and how good the interpretations of both Jeremy Brett and David Burke were - they were so close to how I imagined both characters while reading that I couldn't believe it!


Overall I had a great time watching the show. Most of the episodes seemed to have a pretty good pacing that kept me interested and I've binge watched it more than once. The only thing that I've had a problem with, and I know this is a pretty popular opinion, was the specials. The novel adaptations were fine - they all had enough material to go on - but I can't really say the same for the short cases… I've already written in my log about this so I don't really want to go on a ramble right now but to sum it up: I don't think they worked for me. Like at all. I am pretty sure it's the fact that most of them deviate so much from the originals and generally feel so stretched out that I just couldn't sit through them. I had to take countless breaks while watching The Last Vampyre and The Eligible Bachelor (genuinely what was that special????? is it me or was it INCREDIBLY bizarre?) simply because I couldn't concentrate and kept losing track of the story. The Master Blackmailer was really good though, I'd say that's the only one I really liked.
But I don't want to end this on a negative note! Ignoring a select few episodes that I didn't really enjoy, the show was incredible. Hell, I'd say it's the definitive Sherlock Holmes adaptation. The adaptations of both the stories and characters are incredible and full of detail, Brett’s acting is spectacular, it keeps itself very close and accurate to the original stories while still adding some touch of its own that generally improves upon them… there's definitely a lot to be said I can't quite put into words.
Forgive me for the lackluster review! I seem to be struggling to write down all of my thoughts. I'll update this eventually when I understand how I feel about the series a bit better.


Sherlock Holmes (1954 - 1955)
Started: 13/12/2024
Finished: 23/12/2024
Full series on Youtube
Review last updated: 24/12/24, 13:43
This has quickly become one of my favorite adaptations ever. I’m surprised at how quickly it happened too - I started watching it 11 days ago yet somehow I’ve grown so fond of it that I’d say it’s my second favorite one so far. It’s different from the other versions, more lighthearted and comical (you could say “sillier”), but it really works. Howard’s interpretation is a younger,

Another thing I realized while rereading my notes for this review is that as the series progresses the episodes genuinely get better. The very first cases are a bit too dumb and fast-paced for my liking, the main conflict often being resolved in the very last minutes and feeling a bit out of nowhere, but as the show nears its end the cases seem to get more serious, interesting and even more mysterious, all of this while improving its pacing tremendously, even though the length of the episodes doesn’t change. I’d say my two favorite episodes were The Baker Street nursemaids and The Christmas pudding, both managing to keep that balance between comical and serious. Plus, in “The Baker Street nursemaids” we get to see Holmes and Watson attempting to parent for the first half of the episode, and in “The Christmas pudding”, besides being a genuinely great episode in general, we get to see both Holmes and Watson be defensive of the other one’s safety when encountering a dangerous criminal that threatens their lives... What other reason could I possibly need to consider them my favorites?
I’ll leave an extract of my personal log (the one that’s down below this page) since I feel it conveys my feelings on this adaptation perfectly and isn’t in need of a rewrite… I hope so. At least it’s pretty genuine.
“(...) The episodes are short and flow quite well, making it very easy to watch which is

To summarize all of this: I absolutely adore this adaptation, I would kill to have more than 39 episodes to watch and I miss them already!!!!!!!


Sherlock Holmes and Doctor Watson (1979 - 1980)
Started: 09/01/2025
Finished: Missing episodes :(
Incomplete series on Youtube (6 episodes missing)
Review last updated: 16/01/2025, 11:42
I haven’t actually managed to finish this show in its entirety since I haven't been able to find 4 out of the total 24 episodes anywhere… It seems most of the VHS YouTube reuploads have been deleted and I was only able to find 2 out of the 6 episodes I was missing by sheer luck digging through Dailymotion. I feel the need to clarify before I continue with the rest of my review since I technically have not finished it and this may or may not reflect on my opinion on the show.
I started watching this adaptation after hearing it was based on some of the episodes from Ronald Howard’s Sherlock and, since that one has become one of my favorites, I was very curious to see how they’d go around it, considering it has the same director. I'll go directly to the point: The adaptation of the cases was really hit or miss. I feel like in some occasions they managed to improve upon them by giving them a more serious or darker feel to them but in some other occasions the cases were badly written… For example, “A case of high security” was one of the most confusing ones for me - I'm not sure if the idea WAS to leave an open ending or conclusion, but either way it made no sense. The mystery kept building up to eventually be left with absolutely no form of resolution. What was the point?
I only remember that particular case feeling extremely confusing and pointless to me, but I’m sure it has happened on various occasions. The writing in general is not that good and most of the 1954 cases are adapted quite poorly… the most lighthearted and comical of them felt like they were taken too seriously and it didn't really work for this specific portrayal of the characters (or at least that's what I thought when watching). An example of this would be “The case of the perfect crime”, which is originally “The neurotic detective”: I felt like this case specifically does not work with this interpretation of Watson whatsoever! It doesn't make any sense for him to act like that throughout the entire thing and is honestly very hard to watch. However, his behavior DOES make sense in the original for some aspects of his personality and relationship with Holmes vary a lot from version to version! I'll expand upon the differences in a bit.
Whitehead's Holmes is a bit dull.

Pickering's Watson is actually one of my favorite interpretations up to date, which is a bit surprising to me since I seemed to have a lot of issues with every other aspect of the show. This Watson is capable, athletic and quite intelligent. Generally very different from Crawford's original interpretation but it works very well with the tone of the show and I'd say is quite accurate to how I view Watson's personality. I was very pleasantly surprised! This is a Watson I can believe has “an experience of women which extends over many nations and three separate continents”.
I was a bit scared their dynamic wouldn't be expanded upon while watching the very first episodes

✶ Scans
Ron Tiner's "Sherlock Holmes and the Duke's Son" illustrations



















Also on Google Drive with better quality. I think.
✶ Bookmarks

✶Pinacotheca Holmesiana: Sidney Paget A complete collection of every Sidney Paget illustration.
✶No Place Like Holmes - Really cool sherlockian site in general but it has an awesome A-Z Index of every Sherlock Holmes performer ever!
✶ XANGÔ DA BAKER STREET: SOCIEDADE - COMUNIDADE DE SHERLOCK HOLMES BRASILEIRA Brazilian Sherlock Holmes community that has a lot of really cool and useful links! Loved exploring the site.
✶Sherlock Hound Archive

Shows
♥ Giant list of Sherlock Holmes adaptations : Exactly what it says!!!!!!
✶ Sherlock Holmes (1956) : Ronald Howard's Sherlock, full series.
✶ Sherlock Holmes (1984) : Jeremy Brett's Sherlock, full series in order, including the specials.
✶ Sherlock Holmes (1939) : Basil Rathbone's Sherlock, although I'm pretty sure the playlist isn't in the right order.
✶ Sherlock Holmes and Doctor Watson (1980) : ALMOST every episode of Geoffrey Whitehead's Holmes. There's around six episodes missing, if I'm not mistaken.
✶ Sherlock Holmes (1964) Douglas Wilmer's Sherlock Holmes.
Interviews
✶Filming In France: a personal experience by Ronald Howard
Articles and blog posts
The Menswear in Sherlock Homes (2009)
Other
✶ Sherlock Holmes Paper Dolls : Well, kind of. I can't seem to find the whole book available in good quality anywhere, but for now this will have to do.
✶ freeenglish.jp/holmes/ : Every original story with a japanese translation. I do not speak japanese. The website is still pretty nice, so I decided to share it here.
✶ IT'S AN ELEMENTARY COVER, MY DEAR WATSON - The Paperback Palette : Really cool blog post that goes over a lot of illustrators and cover art for the books throughout the years.
✶ The Queer History of Sherlock Holmes : "A history of queer adaptations of Sherlock Holmes"
✶ Joan Watson's Closet : Some of the clothes Lucy Liu wears while interpreting Watson. Pretty neat :)
✶ Art gallery
Theres also a lot of ship art okay #sorry
My ACD Holmes designs














Granada





Howard











Soviet








Whitehead








My Dearly Beloved Detective


Elementary


✶ Me and Sherlock Holmes
Considering that Sherlock Holmes is a pretty huge character in pop culture, I can't pinpoint when I first heard about the stories at all, but I must admit that even though I've put all this work into this site I only really got into it quite recently…
If I'm not mistaken, the first time I actually read one of the books was back in 2021 for literature class. I had a really good time with “Study in Scarlet” (well, kind of, the second part of the book was pretty hard to get into) and was pleasantly surprised by the end of it. I've always loved the detective genre and getting to read one of the very first instances of it was pretty fun, plus the fact I found Holmes to be fascinating. Either way, my very first encounters with the character were not the original stories, but the modern adaptations that used to be in cable TV; I used to watch a lot of it as a child and I remember always sharing my mothers fascination for the detective and crime genre, so we used to watch a lot of shows together. “Elementary” was definitely the one I watched the most, but I've forgotten practically everything about it (I am in the middle of watching the entire thing in order as I write this, though).
I think I may be digressing a little here. I'll try to get to the point.
My full blown fixation started around the 17th of August, 2024. That's the exact date I started to talk about “The Sign of Four” to my friends… I always know a fixation is about to get bad if I start bothering everyone around me talking about it, and get bad it did.
The thing is that this obsession was kind of derived from my previous one, which was the Argentine 2002 show “Los simuladores”. I'll try to be brief while explaining this but forgive me if I'm not.
The show basically consists of a group of four guys that work as “pretenders”, they set up stages, situations and characters and precisely while “pretending” they fix whatever issue people come to them with. In the eighth episode of season two, Fin de semana de descanso, they take a two-day vacation in Entre Ríos and, despite the fact they were there to get away from their quite excruciating job, the main character ends up solving a murder case with the help of the rest of the group and a newly introduced character who ends up being his “companion” of sorts during the episode.
This episode is FILLED with Sherlock Holmes references. The main character, Mario Santos, is a complete nerd about the stories, bringing “A Study in Scarlet” to read during the trip, wearing a deer-stalker and smoking a pipe (despite the fact that his preferred method of smoking is usually a cigar) during almost the entirety of the episode and correcting a police officer that belittles him for questioning the facts of the murder case.
(I have to correct him though.
I can't help myself. Sherlock Holmes does not wear a beret, but he doesn't wear a deerstalker either… not canonically at least, unless you consider the Paget illustrations to be canonical as well. It's quite clear he most likely doesn't mean to say he explicitly wears one in the books, only that the hat he wears in most illustrations is actually a hunting hat. Even goes as far as to mention the double visor. I felt like I may have to clarify that.)
Honestly, there's a bunch of references on pretty much every minute of this episode so going through the entire thing would make this section completely unreadable, but I will leave this scene here which basically sums it all up in a minute or two.
Santos' companion in this scene, Javier Loyola, somewhat acts as a John Watson to his Sherlock Holmes. The dynamic is really present whenever we get to see them interact and it reminds me a lot of the first novel, with the first meetings and all… Anyway! The point is that I've watched this episode obsessively. I lost the count around the tenth rewatch. And of course since I had no reason whatsoever to rewatch the same episode again since I had reached the point where I could practically recite every line by memory, I decided the natural course of action was to retake my literature class reading and get a bit more into Sherlock Holmes. To be completely honest, it was purely motivated by my obsession with this show and particular episode and I was not expecting what followed whatsoever… To put it in perspective, since it is now March, it has been around 7 months since this fixation started. I hadn't had a hyperfixation of these proportions and duration since 2020. Four years! It's completely insane to me. And to think it derived from my favorite show of all time is pretty cool, although I do feel kind of bad that Holmes single handedly killed my previous obsession.
So that's basically it. I think the main reason why these stories appeal so much to me is the fact I've managed to find Holmes so weirdly relatable. I say weirdly because I most definitely do not think of myself as this genius detective with an almost inhuman ability for deduction, but there's a lot of little details and things about his personality and attitude that speak to me, in a way. There's also the fact that I hold detective stories very close to my heart and that they bring a lot of nostalgia, and that there's a myriad of adaptations I can choose from and watch in whatever order I want. I usually struggle a lot with series or shows that have a linear and overarching plot or content because it's hard for me to keep my interest and I get easily overwhelmed. Since most of the adaptations (at least the ones I like) keep the short story format of the original books they're pretty easy to pick up and watch casually, so I end up finding them much more enjoyable. It's pretty obvious from my log that I tend to watch things in a pretty unorderly way and I tend to pick up and drop a lot of adaptations whenever I feel like it.
Well, I think I don't have much else to say. I'm bad at conclusions so I'm closing this off here.